Sunday, August 19, 2012

Intellectual Leaders - How Will They Help?


Creating academically sophisticated, intellectual leaders may help prevent people from taking advantage of others in several different ways; first, intellectual leaders will not only rely on their authority and power, but will have true leadership skills, which will lead them to benefit the entire society, as opposed to only benefitting themselves. “Leadership is the process of persuasion or example by which an individual (or leadership team) induces a group to pursue objectives held by the leader or shared by the leader and his or her followers.” (Gardner) According to this definition, we can see that a leader has not only influence on his or her actions, but also plays a very influential role in the lives of his or her followers, having a great effect on the society in which one lives. This is something a lot of people do not consider about when thinking about leadership – they instead focus on their power and authority, as represented by the image below. 




With intellectual, academically sophisticated leaders, a noticeably stronger democratic society would be built, for the people would be a lot more engaged in the decisions being made for the community, wanting to assist and make a difference for the better of the society as a whole. The individuals in the community would not only be concerned with their well being, but would want to create a system in which the entire society is able to benefit from. Rather than being persuaded into political arguments without properly being able to fathom them, people would be engaged and aware of their government’s actions and decisions, hence constructing a sophisticated and stronger democratic society. 





Academic Knowledge and Manipulation

Academic knowledge, as we all know, can easily provide individuals with advantages in certain situations, such as an academic discussion or debate; it can also offer people the idea of superiority over others. This can lead to a different posture, and different ways of seeing and approaching various situations. For example, having a superior education will a lot of times lead people to the conclusion you are credible, and hence believe everything you say, giving you great opportunity to manipulate and take advantage of their trust. Supporting your opinion with "evidence," as some might call it, may add, when presented the right way, even more credibility to your argument. However, once you look closely into the ideas and arguments people have used, they are not always being used correctly, sometimes corrupting the argument rather than supporting it. As we have read in the article by Jared Diamond, "Romney Hasn't Done His Homework," presidential candidate Mitt Romney can be served as an example. Diamond claims that in one of his speeches, delivered in Jerusalem, Romney made a clear misinterpretation of the view points and statements made in his book, "Guns, Germs and Steel," leading Jared Diamond to discredit the fact that the candidate had even truly read it. 



Under the scenario that my work were being used for the manipulation of others, as scientist and author Jared Diamond stated has been done to him, my response - would I have the same influence and resources as Diamond - might not be different from his. I would simply like to state the true meaning and objective of my work, and make people aware of the mistake that had been made. 

What is Academic Leadership?


In the first couple of weeks, through articles and class discussions, we have been able to understand more about the course and its goals. To me, the concept of Academic Leadership revolves greatly around understanding what true leadership is, and, through that, being able to turn activities and topics that we really enjoy learning more about, and turning them into academic subjects. It has been emphasized to us that anything we enjoy – as non-academic as it may seem – can easily be turned into something academic, which we will be working more on on our individual projects. As the video linked below states, for me, academic leadership broadly involves "looking beyond the leadership of the institution to ways people think more broadly about their academic work." In my perspective, this means expanding our knowledge on what "academic" really means, and how we can relate other things that we are interested and passionate about, turning them into academic topics that we are eager to work on.  

For the purpose of this post, watch the video below from  0:00 to 0:46




A topic that I have found myself being eager to learn is psychology; I have always been interested to learn more about how our mind works, and what leads people to do the things they do. Last year, in our English class, after watching some of Sam Harris’ lectures, we discussed the topic of religion and free will. These caused great controversy in our class, for everyone either strongly agreed or disagreed with Harris’ argument. Since we only looked into a couple of topics, I would be very interested to look into other concepts that have been presented, not focusing only on Sam Harris, but also integrating other psychologists, such as Steven Pinker. I think it would be extremely intriguing to look at various different arguments and perspectives, being then able to make my own conclusions and sophisticated opinion on the different topics being analyzed. However, I do have other interests that are very different from this specific topic, and I will definitely have to ponder more on the subject in order to make the correct decision for my Individual Project.